I can’t help but feel partly responsible, but this damn Carrie Prejean story just won’t go away:

The directors of the Miss California USA pageant — who met early Tuesday to determine whether Carrie Prejean violated her contract by working with a national group opposed to gay marriage and by posing semi-nude when she was a teenage model — have yet to decide if Prejean should be stripped of her crown.

Neal said Tuesday that Prejean had run afoul of several parts of the 12-page contract that all prospective contestants were required to sign… The detailed document… prohibits Miss California from making personal appearances, giving interviews or making commercials without permission from pageant officials, Us confirms.

Uh oh! They might strip her of her “Miss California” title! Does that mean she’ll no longer hold veto power in the state senate? Or be second in line to inherit the throne if the King of California dies? Or would it just be a totally arbitrary technical distinction that will only enhance Prejean’s publicity and visibility for her continued crusade against gay marriage?

The correct answer is…the second sentence. The King one.

Can you unnecessarily shoehorn religion into your response, Ms. Prejean?

“I am a Christian, and I am a model,” she said in a statement Tuesday.

…aaaaand this concludes our last Miss California post for quite a while (barring a sex tape release). Thanks for listening.